By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Accept

zszhair.com

  • Phone
    PhoneShow More
    Xiaomi 11i Hypercharge 5G review
    24/09/2023
    OnePlus Nord 2T review
    23/09/2023
    Realme 9 5G review
    23/09/2023
    OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G review
    23/09/2023
    Black Shark 4 Pro review
    22/09/2023
  • Smart Home
    Smart HomeShow More
    Zigma Smart Aerio 300 Wi-Fi Air Purifier review
    24/09/2023
    Tokit Omni Cook review
    23/09/2023
    Instant Vortex Plus air fryer review
    22/09/2023
    Samsung Bespoke tall fridge review
    21/09/2023
    Blusafe Breeze review
    19/09/2023
  • Headphone
    HeadphoneShow More
    Nokia Essential Wireless Headphones (E1200) review
    23/09/2023
    NuraTrue Pro review
    22/09/2023
    Marshall Motif ANC review
    20/09/2023
    Xiaomi Buds 3T Pro review
    19/09/2023
    Jabra Elite 3 review
    16/09/2023
  • Health
    HealthShow More
    Zuvi Halo review
    19/09/2023
    Moon electric toothbrush review
    18/09/2023
    Noerden Minimi Smart Body Scale review
    15/09/2023
    Revamp Liberate compact cordless straightener review
    13/09/2023
    PomaBrush review
    12/09/2023
  • Laptop
    LaptopShow More
    Asus ZenBook 14 (UX3402) review
    23/09/2023
    Asus ROG Flow Z13 review
    20/09/2023
    Huawei MateBook 16s (2022) review
    18/09/2023
    Dell XPS 15 9510 (late 2021) review
    17/09/2023
    Huawei MateBook X Pro (2022) review
    16/09/2023
  • Tablet
    TabletShow More
    Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 review
    24/09/2023
    Realme Pad Mini review
    24/09/2023
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra review
    23/09/2023
    Lenovo Tab P12 Pro review
    20/09/2023
    Amazon Fire 7 (2022) review
    20/09/2023
  • …
    • Accessories
    • Audio
    • Camera
    • Chromebook
    • Display
    • Drone
    • Electric Bike & Scooter
    • Entertainment
    • eReader
    • Game
    • iPad
    • Lighting
    • NAS
    • Networking
    • Printer
    • Security
    • Smart Heating & Thermostat
    • Smart Security
    • Smartwatch
    • Software
    • Speaker
    • Storage
    • TV
    • Wearable Tech
  • Contact
  • English
    • Polski
    • Deutsch
    • Français
    • Русский
    • Español
Reading: QNAP HS-264 review
Share
Aa

zszhair.com

Aa
  • Phone
  • Smart Home
  • Headphone
  • Health
  • Laptop
  • Tablet
  • …
  • Contact
  • English
Search
  • Phone
  • Smart Home
  • Headphone
  • Health
  • Laptop
  • Tablet
  • …
    • Accessories
    • Audio
    • Camera
    • Chromebook
    • Display
    • Drone
    • Electric Bike & Scooter
    • Entertainment
    • eReader
    • Game
    • iPad
    • Lighting
    • NAS
    • Networking
    • Printer
    • Security
    • Smart Heating & Thermostat
    • Smart Security
    • Smartwatch
    • Software
    • Speaker
    • Storage
    • TV
    • Wearable Tech
  • Contact
  • English
    • Polski
    • Deutsch
    • Français
    • Русский
    • Español
zszhair.com > NAS > QNAP HS-264 review
NAS

QNAP HS-264 review

Eric Brown
Eric Brown 31/08/2023
Share
16 Min Read
SHARE

At a Glance

Pros

  • Powerful platform
  • Dual 2.5GbE LAN
  • 8GB DDR4 RAM
  • Silent

Cons

  • Zero upgrades
  • No M.2 slot for caching
  • Remote control not included

Our Verdict

The HS-264 is quiet, powerful, understated and flexible. The only trick QNAP missed was adding an M.2 slot for caching, forcing the use of one bay for this purpose to achieve maximum performance.

Contents
At a GlanceProsConsOur VerdictDesign & BuildSpecs & FeaturesUpgradesUser ExperiencePriceVerdictSpecsQNAP HS-264: Specs

Many NAS drives get used to store media collections that are invariably a mix of media types that the owners want to have access to on a TV or mobile devices about the home.

But, conventional ‘shoe box’ designs don’t naturally lend themselves to deployment to a lounge since they tend to be far from discrete.

QNAP is one of the NAS makers that don’t follow the crowd, and its new HS-264 isn’t like anything that the likes of Synology or Asustor offer. This device has been designed to reside in the general living space alongside the games consoles and cable TV boxes but offers all the functionality that we associate with a modern NAS.

Compared with a simple NAS box, this is an expensive solution as the barebones kit is £599/US$599. This begs the obvious question about the extra investment and what the owner gets for their money.

Does the TS-264 deliver enough bang for the significant bucks QNAP is asking?

Design & Build

The scale and shape of the TS-264 have much more in common with a set-top TV box like Sky Q than a NAS, at just over 4cm thick and 30cm wide.

The chosen form factor makes it look much more at home alongside a TV, but it restricts the number of drive bays available to just two.

QNAP HS-264 drive bay

Access to the bays is via a magnetically secured front plate which reveals two buttons that release the aluminium trays where drives are mounted. The tray design is a little odd, in that the drives are mounted from underneath (3.5- and 2.5in) and then hanging them inverted.

That you have to use screws to mount the drives is a little disappointing, but it’s generally only something that will happen once for most owners.

Along with the HS-264, QNAP includes a laptop-style PSU with a maximum power output of 65W, mounting screws and a single LAN cable.

Two cables might have been more appropriate since on the back of the NAS are two 2.5GbE LAN ports together with two USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) ports and two HDMI 2.0 video outlets. On the rear panel are a Kensington security slot, a power on button and a reset hole.

QNAP HS-264 ports

While the outside is shiny dust-attracting plastic, the frame that holds the internal electronics and the drive bays is metal, and this unit is well constructed. Large rubber feet underneath hold the device well clear of whatever surface it’s sitting on, and vents underneath allow for passive circulation of air.

That last point is critical because QNAP promotes this product as ‘silent’, and unless you have especially noisy drive mechanisms, it mostly is.

Specs & Features

Considering that the customers that this product is firmly aimed at are media serving, QNAP didn’t take the HS-264 in a direction where it was dumbed down only to deliver that functionality.

On paper, the specification of this NAS is closer to an entry-level desktop PC, being built around the Intel Celeron N5105 quad-core and 4-thread processor, with a burst clock speed up to 2.9GHz. Combined with 8GB of DDR4, this hardware is at the apex of that available for a home NAS and is more powerful than many NAS built for business users.

This silicon has an integrated Intel UHD Graphics subsystem, enabling it to directly output video to an HDMI connected TV in resolutions up to 4K (3840 x 2160) at 60Hz.

QNAP HS-264 drives

What’s especially lovely about the available ports is that the USB interfaces are 10Gb/s USB 3.2 Gen 2 variety, enabling external drives to be effectively used both for directly sharing over the NAS and backing up the contents.

With each port supporting more than 1000Mb/s of transfer bandwidth, they neatly negate the limitation of having just two drive bays, as an external USB RAID array could easily be attached. Equally, the inclusion of dual 2.5GbE LAN ports also opens up new possibilities.

Getting the most out of this configuration requires either a switch that can use link aggregation or the activation of SMB (Server Message Block) multichannel mode on both the unit and connecting computers.

The Link aggregation option not only requires a switch that this can be set but also limits the throughput of a single client to just one of the 2.5GbE lines. Whereas the SMB multichannel option merely requires that both lines are connected to a switch, and the client machine has a similar configuration with two lines or more.

However, there is a documented issue with SMB multichannel, which has stopped QNAP, Synology and others from adding the interface controls to activate this feature of SMB 3.0. It can be switched by editing a specific file on the NAS if you are familiar with the vi editor.

Some have used it without problems, while others have encountered file corruption issues.

qnap_hs-264_02_thumb

Those who embrace SMB multichannel can achieve file transfers above 400MB/s if they’ve installed SSDs in their HS-264 and have dual 2.5GbE LAN ports on the client PC.

Without that feature active, the best performance is likely to be around 230MB/s over a single 2.5GbE LAN port, or 113MB/s if the client only has a gigabit connection.

Upgrades

Where this design could be better is in respect of upgrades.

The provided RAM is directly soldered to the mainboard, and no additional socket is provided, so 8GB of DDR4 is all it will ever have. That said, unless you intend to truly hammer the HS-264 with virtualisation, media serving and camera capture all running at once, 8GB is a decent amount of memory.

For file serving purposes, this much memory is certainly sufficient, as my experimentation with adding memory to most NAS reveals no significant performance benefits to more than 8GB. If you intend to run applications primarily, a NAS with more RAM might be advantageous.

But where the lack of additions hurts the HS-264 most is in respect of cache memory. The only way to add that is by using one of the two available drive bays occupying one with a 2.5in SATA SSD.

QNAP HS-264 silent NAS

An option for a single M.2 slot, SATA or NVMe SSD would have made an enormous difference to this machine, as cache could be added without needing to borrow a drive bay. But surely, hard drives will work well enough without cache?

To make proper use of the two 2.5GbE LAN adapters, an SSD cache or using SSD drives is a necessity. Two conventional hard drives working together in RAID 0 aren’t faster enough to flood both LAN ports with the bandwidth they can handle.

If you only use one drive, then the send bay needs a SATA SSD installed and configured as cache, or you won’t be able to fully utilise a single 2.5GbE port, never mind two of them.

User Experience

As with all the QNAP NAS we’ve tried recently, including the TS-230, the HS-264 is relatively easy to get operational.

Once the unit has a drive or drives installed and connected to the LAN, it can be found on the network and installation of the QTS operating system can begin.

This process doesn’t take long, and as part of this preamble, various critical applications are installed to get the NAS operational. The web interface is very like what we’ve seen from Synology, TerraMaster and Asustor, providing a simple means to control the OS and applications on it.

With the processor and memory available on this unit, the interface is remarkably responsive even when you’ve loaded it up with numerous applications.

qnap_hs-264_interface_thumb

Where the HS-264 diverts from the norm is that with its HDMI outputs, it has a secondary interface, HybridDesk Station. This isn’t part of the web experience and is only visible via the HDMI ports on a connected TV or monitor, and special applications are available to install on it, like Chrome, LibreOffice, Facebook and many more.

Within the constraints of web-based content, anything you can normally operate with a web browser should be accessible through HybvridDesk Station, assuming you have a mouse and keyboard connected to the HS-264 to control them.

The NAS has an IR sensor, allowing it to be controlled with a suitable remote, but amazingly QNAP doesn’t bundle one with it despite the asking price. The official remote is another US$29.99, though it might work with other programmable IR controllers.

For those curious about the two HDMI ports, they can either display an extended environment over the two connected displays or mirror the contents.

This aspect of the HS-264 is one of the better HDMI interface implementations that I’ve seen, and the number of potential applications that can utilise this functionality makes this hardware very flexible. This functionality is ideal for those who want to use it as both a working system and a NAS simultaneously.

Price

The bare-bones cost of the HS-264-8G is £599/US$599, available from Amazon UK and Amazon US 

It can also be found with preinstalled drives increasing the price from 2x1TB drives for £842 up to 2x10TB for £1,285.

However, given that a Seagate 10TB Iron Wolf NAS drive is around £260/ US$240), those wanting to save a significant amount should buy the drives independently and take the two minutes to install them.

Find more options in our best NAS drive chart.

Verdict

The QNAP HS-264 has many excellent features, and the amount of processing power and memory in it provides an impressive platform for those that wish to use a NAS for more than file serving.

However, due to the dual-drive configuration and lack of a dedicated M.2 cache slot, it’s challenging to get all the performance available over the potential 5Gbps of network bandwidth available.

There is so much spare power in this system it is possible to use it as a conventional computer, hooking up a mouse, keyboard and monitor to access productivity applications through HybridDesk Station.

It’s also an excellent tool for those developing software, as it supports three of the most commonly used Virtual platforms and a slew of development suites.

That last point hints at just how flexible the HS-264 is, even if QNAP are primarily pushing this hardware as a media centre. And, for the majority of home users, some of the power in this machine will never be used or needed.

What it does offer is the ability to load extra demands on the NAS without worrying that these requirements might excessively stress the platform. It should be possible to make this a media centre, personal Cloud server and security camera storage without it appearing sluggish at any of those tasks.

The downside to having that much power is a bare-bones two-bay NAS for £599/$599, being more expensive than the Asustor Lockerstor 2 (AS660ST) by £200/$200.

For those with less ambitious plans, some of the lesser Synology boxes can be bought for a similar outlay, but these come with hard drives included in that price. What these NAS drives don’t come with is 2.5GbE LAN ports.

Anyone considering buying this needs to understand that to get the most out of it probably means running a single drive, and SATA SSD in combination, that a 2.5GbE switch is a necessity, and also dual 2.5GbE LAN ports are required on the client PC end to make for the fastest file transfers.

If you’re willing to make those infrastructure investments and buy appropriate storage and external drives to back it up, then the HS-264 is something of a silent behemoth and a handy platform.

Specs

QNAP HS-264: Specs

  • Processor: Intel Celeron N5105 4-core/4-thread processor, burst up to 2.9 GHz
  • Memory: 8GB DDR4 (Not expandable)
  • Drives: 2x 3.5in or 2.5in SATA HDD/SSD (drives not included)
  • RAID Modes: Single, JBOD, RAID 0, RAID 1
  • Networking: 2x 2.5GbE LAN port
  • Networking Protocols: CIFS/SMB, NFS, FTP, AFP, TFTP, HTTPS, SSH, iSCSI, SNMP (V2,V3) USB ports: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) Port
  • HDMI Output: 2x HDMI 2.0 (up to resolution 3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz)
  • OS: QTS 5.0
  • OS Languages: Chinese (Traditional & Simplified), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazil), Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish
  • Maximum capacity: 40TB (2x 20TB)
  • Maximum Single Volume: 250TB
  • Internal drive formats: EXT4
  • External drive formats: EXT3, EXT4, NTFS, FAT32, HFS+, and exFAT (license required)
  • Size (HxWxD): 41.3 x 302 x 220 mm
  • Warranty: 5 years
Eric Brown 31/08/2023
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Share
Previous Article Microsoft Surface Pro 8 review
Next Article OnePlus 10 Pro review

Hot

Huawei MateBook 16s (2022) review
18/09/2023 18 Min Read
Honor Magic 4 Lite 5G review
20/09/2023 16 Min Read
Creality Sermoon V1 Pro review
10/09/2023 17 Min Read
Dell XPS 15 9510 (late 2021) review
17/09/2023 14 Min Read
Realme GT Neo 3T review
15/09/2023 17 Min Read

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?